Chapter 1 discusses some of the changes assessments have gone through over time, such as their uses throughout psychology, as well as their uses within art therapy. It also has a checklist of sorts for what clinicians should do for assessments, so as to get the most accurate information possible. Chapter 2 then delves more into legal responsibilities and obligations and such.
We also learned about the Bender-Gestalt assessment today. Here is some more information;
Basic Information
• By Lauretta Bender, 1938
• One of the most used psychological tests.
• Developmental test for children and psychopathology in adults
• Individually administered, paper and pencil test that contains 9 geometric figures.
• Bender (1938) operated under the assumption “that the visual gestalt function is a fundamental function associated with language ability and closely associated with various functions of intelligence such as visual perception, manual motor ability, memory, temporal and spatial concepts and organization” (p. 112).
Constructs and Models
• Visual-Motor Perception and Integration
• Bender: Maturation and psychopathology
• Hutt: psychodynamic projective personality
• Koppitz: Development
• Lacks: Neuropsychological screener
Previous Research
• Piotrowski (1995)
“mainstay in the assessment battery…as an assessment tool in appraisal of intelligence…as a screening technique for neuropsychological dysfunction, a clinical tool for sampling visual-motor proficiency, and as a standard projective technique in the assessment of personality” (p.1272)
Visual Disorders
• Agnosia – inability to visually identify
• Hemianopia – half loss of visual field
• Scotoma – small lesions, spots in visual field
• Optic Ataxia – deficit in visually guided hand movements
• Prosopagnosia – facial agnosia
• Alexia – inability to read
• Neglect
Article
six designs (A, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8) as deHirsch, Jansky, and Langford (1966) and Jansky and deHirsch (1972), a six-point scoring system was devised for greater differentiation in scoring each design. Scoring ranged from 0, for random drawing, scribbling, having no concept of the design, to 3, all major elements present and recognizable with only minor distortions, to 5, accurate representation. Does not capture whole design (see ASB, Innovative Features of BG II (Brannigan, Decker, & Madsen)
History of Scoring
• Qualitative methods based on rating scale demonstrate high reliability and validity, (Sattler)
• Capture whole performance
• Clear construct dimension
New Developments
The revision of the BGT is currently taking place, and includes:
1. New items
2. Memory recall
3. National norms (N=5,000)
4. Clinical validity
5. Time and planning estimates
6. Quantitative/Qualitative scoring
7. Co-normed with Stanford-Binet
8. Test observation form
Assessment Process
- Review Referral Info
- Obtain Background, Social, and Setting Information
- Hypothesis Development
- Select & Administer Tests
- Interpret results
- Intervention Strategies/Recommendation
- Report
- Communicate with Teacher/Parent
- Follow up
Here is a link for an article dealing with the KFD:
No comments:
Post a Comment